Designing for 3 a.m.
Most interfaces are designed at 11 in the morning by rested people. Some are used at 3 at night by exhausted ones. Here is what changes.
The person at the other end is tired
Fatigue narrows attention. A tired person reads less, scans more, and falls back on habit. They miss the third item in a list and the small grey text that explains the exception.
That is not a user failing. It is a condition, as real as low vision or a noisy room, and it can be designed for.
Put the next action first
At 3 a.m. nobody wants an overview. They want to know what to do next and how long they have. On Night Ward the most-used element was not the board of beds, but a plain list of the next sixty minutes, in time order.
If your product has a dashboard, ask what the person does after looking at it. Then consider showing that instead.
Nobody wants an overview at 3 a.m. They want the next thing.
Dark mode is not a style
For night work a dark theme is functional. Bright screens wake patients, ruin night vision and cause glare on glossy tablets. But dark themes are often designed last and tested least.
Design the dark version first if your product is used at night. Check contrast in both themes, and check it on the actual device in the actual room.
Make waiting a valid state
Many systems can only say “do this now”. Real work is full of things that can wait: a patient asleep, a delivery that is late but on its way. Give people a way to say “later”, record why, and stop asking.
Every alarm a system raises unnecessarily teaches people to ignore the next one.
— Mara
Reply by e-mailMore writing
The case for fewer alerts
Alert fatigue is a design problem, not a discipline problem. Four questions I ask before any notification ships.
Write the empty state first
The first screen most people see is an empty one. Designing it first makes the rest of the product clearer.